UPSC CSE: No Interim Relief, Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Ex

Card image

UPSC CSE: No Interim Relief, Delhi High Court Asks CAT To Expeditiously Decide On Plea To Lower CSAT Cut-Off

By Team EOS |

The Delhi High Court on Wednesday asked the Central Administrative Tribunal to decide expeditiously the Plea  seeking reduction in the cut off from 33% to 23% for qualifying Part II (CSAT) exam of 2023 Civil Services Examination conducted by UPSC last month.

A vacation bench of Justice C Hari Shankar and Justice Manoj Jain  refused the interim relief and disposed of a moved by a group of civil services aspirants against the Tribunal’s refusal to grant any interim relief.

“The Central Administrative Tribunal is requested to decide OA as expeditiously as possible. Needless to say, keeping in accordance with principles of natural justice. The petition is disposed of,” the court ordered.

On June 09, the CAT had issued notice on the plea seeking reduction in the cut off but refused any interim relief and listed the matter for hearing on July 06.

The candidates then moved the High Court submitting that the matter before the Tribunal will become infructuous by July 06. It was prayed that the UPSC be restrained from acting any further on the prelims results declared on June 12.

During the hearing today, Advocate Saaket Jain representing the petitioners took the court through the examination notification issued by the UPSC on February 01 and referred to the syllabus mentioned therein.

“The Tribunal has not thrown out your case. It has issued notice on your OA. The matter is now listed on July 06. Your prayer… no court will pass an order staying the entire CSE 2023. It is an ex facie prayer which cannot be granted. There are plethora of judgments of Supreme Court,” the bench said.

It added: “Even if you are… because a stay is granted not only on a prima facie case and balance of convenience… Given the fact that even if hundreds of students go to court, the balance of convenience can never be on staying appointments. There are decisions which say that courts should not look on question papers.“

As Jain submitted that he was not touching upon the merits of the case and was only showing why the matter deserves an interim relief, Justice Shankar orally said: “You are taking us through the notification. Then we will address it, then we will see whether questions are below syllabus. In a vacation bench we are doing it… you have started by going through syallabus, what is it if not merits?”

The court then disposed of the matter after Jain requested the court to pass an order directing the CAT to decide the case expeditiously. The prayer was not opposed by Advocate Naresh Kaushik who appeared for UPSC.

The petition before the High Court said that the matter affects lakhs of students across the country. “Since the result for the same has been declared on 12.06.2023, it is necessary that this matter be heard at the earliest,” it added.

Source

Latest News

Latest Posts

Card image

S. 50 NDPS Act Not Applicable To Recovery From Bag Carried By A Person: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court recently reiterated that the conditions for personal search as specified in Section 50 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act are applicable only for the search of the physical body of the person and not for ...

Card image

ED Summons: What to Do & What NOT to Do (Complete Legal Guide – 2026)

Receiving a summons from the Enforcement Directorate (ED) can be stressful and confusing for individuals, business owners, and company directors. However, understanding your legal rights and obligations can help you respond effectively and avoid serious consequences. This guide explains what ...

Card image

Recruitment Process -Last Date To Fulfil Eligibility Criteria Is Last Date To Submit Applications, In The Absence Of Any Specific Rule: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court emphasized that where there is an absence of any specific rule or prescription, the last day for fulfilling eligibility is the last date of submission of the application. The Court made the observation while refusing the benefit ...

Card image

Cheque Bounce Case Can Be Quashed U/S 482 Only If Amount Is Patently Non-Recoverable; Whether Debt Time-Barred Or Not Is A Question Of Evidence : SC

The Supreme Court observed that the question whether a cheque was issued towards a time barred debt is to be decided on evidence. “It is only in cases wherein an amount which is out and out non-recoverable, towards which a ...

Card image

Members Of Railway Protection Force Can Seek Benefit Under Employees Compensation Act Though RPF Declared As An Armed Force: Supreme Court

The Supreme Court on Monday (26.09.2023), held that an officer of the Railway Protection Force (RPF) can seek compensation under Employees Compensation Act, 1923 even though the RPF has been declared to be an armed force of the Union. “..in ...

Card image

ADR in Real Estate & Construction Disputes | Fast-Track Legal Solutions

The real estate and construction sector in India is one of the fastest-growing industries, but it is also one of the most dispute-prone. Delays in possession, payment disputes, contractor disagreements, quality issues, and non-compliance with project timelines often lead to ...

EOS Chambers of Law

Speak With Our
Experts Today!

Get a Appointment
EOS Chambers of Law